A crucial e in 1993 when the Ninth Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled in MAI Systems Corp
A crucial e in 1993 when the Ninth Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled in MAI Systems Corp v. Peak Computer Inc. that the local, impermanent copy of an operating system that is loaded into a computer’s RAM upon its booting up – a necessary component of a computer’s operation – is, by virtue of making a copy of intellectual property (the operating system), subject to copyright law. This “deeply stupid ruling,” Fairfield tells Vox, laid a trap, making the use of any software (broadly meaning nearly anything used on a computer system) a copyright violation unless the user followed rules https://kissbrides.com/fi/victoriabrides-arvostelu/ set unilaterally by the manufacturer and/or seller. “That was the case that handed the keys to the kingdom to these companies,” Fairfield says. …